For organization needs to leadership. Any department without leadership can’t run ahead because it has internal problem. So, necessary to make a leadership o f leadership in organizations really then what is it, and what does it do? It’s all well and good to argue that we’ve had it wrong all these years about how organizations are best led; it’s even entertaining to see the self-involved and self-congratulatory individual leader hauled over the coals for a change. But when we refocus on the issue after absorbing these ideas, there they remain: organizations.
begin with, the concept of organizational leadership, as described here, is not entirely new. For almost a century, various observers have glimpsed the self-organizing characteristics of groups, and their natural tendency, more or less of their own accord, to design and direct their own affairs. More than that, there have also been suggestions in the literature that leadership and authority are to be viewed as distinctly separate phenomena. A self-organizing – better, a self-leading – group may sound terrific. But if you’re an owner, you’re likely to have some valid reservations about surrendering the fate of your investment and goals to that process. You will want, directly or through the medium of professional executive management, to direct and control the operation of that process. This is accomplished through placing a distinct and separate authority at the top of the organization, in order to manage the otherwise self-directing leadership that exists naturally within it. That authority at the top is not leadership as commonly understood. Rather, it is command. It gives legitimate expression to the superior role of management over the inferior function of leadership.
No comments:
Post a Comment